Experiments
The evolution of classical concepts describing physical phenomena stalled for two main reasons:
Despite this historical shift, a number of credible experiments still point to the existence of an underlying physical substrate — some form of foundational medium.
Furthermore, there are several valid experiments that point, at the very least, to the existence of a certain physical substrate which serves as a foundation for all that exists. These include:
-
The Sagnac-Harris experiment.
-
The resistance of objects to changes in their state of motion (inertia).
-
The presence of centrifugal force.
The weakness of these experiments lies in their inability to determine either the direction of motion or the velocity of an inertial reference frame.
This measurement gap — instrumentally resolving both direction and speed — was addressed only after revisiting the pre-1905 context and reanalyzing the foundational assumptions of that era.
That retrospective analysis produced a workable solution!
Without diving into proprietary details, the core insight turned out to be far less complicated than expected. It enabled the formulation of two experiments that are theoretically straightforward but require highly specific conditions to execute. These experimental setups are reserved for discussion with interested partners.
Conclusions:
Considering the available and anticipated experimental data on detecting directional motion and velocity relative to the substrate, the applied implications are unambiguous. The primary one is the feasibility of a fully autonomous navigation device (see Projects, item 2) capable of determining position on the Earth’s surface, underwater at any depth, and even underground — without GPS, without external reference signals, and without vulnerability to interference of any kind.